Solana vs Hyperliquid vs Near Protocol for crypto buyers weighing liquidity, fees and AI upside
Video: These 3 Crypto Coins Are Getting Ready To EXPLODE!?
You can order the same kind of articles for your own video to boost it on YouTube and Google. Just message the Telegram bot @sat_sit_bot. Articles with your video embedded are written and posted by the bot itself — on popular topical sites (no ads). Try it free: 50 articles on us.
· based on the channel Altcoin Daily
Crypto traders looking for the next breakout are comparing Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol, and the short answer is that Solana wins on liquidity and ecosystem depth, Hyperliquid wins on fee-driven token demand, and Near Protocol is the higher-risk bet on the AI narrative. Altcoin Daily frames all three as coins "getting ready to explode," but each one explodes for a different reason, and the risks are not the same. You can follow the channel's ongoing coverage through its Altcoin Daily Twitter account, where the team posts the same setups between uploads.
The ranking below is not a price target list. It is a comparison of what has to go right for each coin, which is the only honest way to answer a question about which asset is "better."
What Altcoin Daily says about the three crypto picks
The segment's core claim is that Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol each sit in front of a catalyst rather than in the middle of one. Solana is treated as the default high-beta large cap: fast, cheap and crowded with retail flow, which makes it the first thing that moves when risk appetite returns. Hyperliquid is presented as a product story as much as a token story, because its perpetuals exchange generates real trading fees that feed back into demand for the asset. Near Protocol is the narrative trade, pitched on AI and on a chain that has spent years building developer tooling without a matching price move.
What the video does not do is give hard price targets or a timeline. That matters, because the difference between the three is mostly about how much of the upside is already priced in.
Solana's edge in liquidity and why viewers keep coming back to it
Solana's advantage is that it is the only one of the three where a retail trader can enter and exit size without moving the market. That depth shows up in the viewer reaction: Solana is the most-mentioned coin under the video, with comments calling it a top-two holding and joking that the answer is simply "Better Call SOL." The chain's combination of low fees and a large memecoin and DeFi ecosystem keeps activity concentrated there, and activity is what drives fee revenue and attention.
The counterargument is equally visible. One of the most-liked comments complains that "Uptober" has turned into "Droptober" again, which is a fair reminder that Solana's beta cuts both ways. In a risk-off week, the same liquidity that makes entries easy makes exits crowded.
Hyperliquid's fee model versus cheaper gas on Arbitrum and Sonic
Hyperliquid's pitch rests on the fact that its token is attached to a working exchange rather than to a roadmap. Perpetuals volume produces fees, fees produce buy pressure, and the token captures that loop directly, which is why the video treats it as a blue-chip-style holding rather than a speculative alt.
The pushback from traders is practical: gas and execution costs. One viewer argues that Arbitrum is cheaper than Hyperliquid once you count gas fees, and others point to Sonic, formerly Fantom, as a faster-moving alternative. That is a real trade-off. Hyperliquid gives you a deep order book and a single venue, while Arbitrum gives you cheap settlement across a broad DeFi ecosystem. Neither is strictly better; they serve different jobs in a portfolio.
Near Protocol and the AI narrative behind the $15 target
The bull case for Near Protocol is that it has real infrastructure and a narrative that has not yet been fully rewarded. Viewers are explicit about the target, with one arguing Near could pump to $15 per coin this cycle and another saying it "saved my portfolio" more than once. The AI angle is what gives that target its logic: if capital keeps rotating into AI-adjacent crypto, Near is one of the few older chains with a credible claim to that label.
The risk is equally simple. Narrative trades depend on the narrative staying hot, and Near has a long history of underperforming its own announcements. Treating $15 as a base case rather than a hope requires the AI rotation to continue and the chain to convert developer activity into usage.
Questions and doubts traders raise about these calls
The most common objection is that the three picks are already well known, and well-known coins rarely "explode" without a new catalyst. That is a fair critique of any breakout list, and the honest answer is that the video is identifying relative strength, not undiscovered gems.
A second cluster of comments pushes alternatives: Bittensor (TAO) is the most-liked name in the thread, followed by Midnight, Zcash, Plume, Grass, Ondo and Aerodrome. Zcash in particular gets a direct comparison, with one viewer calling it better than Near. A third theme is timing, with traders noting that October has repeatedly failed to deliver the rally the calendar suggests. The useful takeaway is to size positions for a market that can stay boring longer than expected, and to check whether each coin's catalyst is a product release, a fee trend or pure sentiment.
Where to follow the analysis and trade
Altcoin Daily's own resources are the starting point for anyone acting on the breakdown. The channel's updates and market threads live at https://twitter.com/AltcoinDaily, and the sponsored promotion in the video points to a WEEX welcome offer with a 50% deposit bonus on the first $100 at https://www.weex.com/events/welcome-event?vipCode=oz5p&qrType=activity. Both are worth reading before you commit capital, and neither replaces your own risk limits.
The bottom line on Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol
For most crypto portfolios the sensible ordering is Solana first for liquidity, Hyperliquid second for fee-linked demand, and Near Protocol third as a smaller, higher-variance position. Solana gives you the cleanest exposure to a broad risk-on move, Hyperliquid gives you a token tied to real trading revenue, and Near gives you the AI narrative with the widest range of outcomes. Keep position sizes proportional to how much of each thesis you can actually verify, and watch fee data rather than price alone. The breakdown comes from Altcoin Daily, and their X account is the place to follow the follow-up.
Key takeaways
- Altcoin Daily's breakdown names Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol as the three coins it expects to move next.
- Solana carries the deepest retail liquidity and the largest ecosystem of the three, which is why it dominates the viewer discussion.
- Hyperliquid combines a perpetuals exchange with its own chain, so trading fees and token demand are tied to platform volume.
- Near Protocol is pitched on its AI narrative, with viewers arguing it could reach $15 per coin this cycle.
- Viewers also push back on the picks, naming Bittensor (TAO), Midnight, Zcash, Arbitrum and Sonic as alternatives worth tracking.
Source: These 3 Crypto Coins Are Getting Ready To EXPLODE!? · Markdown version
Questions & answers
Which of the three coins does Altcoin Daily consider the strongest pick?
The video treats Solana as the most liquid and most established of the three, Hyperliquid as the one with the clearest fee-driven demand, and Near Protocol as the highest-risk AI narrative trade. It does not rank them with a single price target, so the "strongest" pick depends on whether you want beta, revenue or narrative exposure.
Why do some traders say Hyperliquid is more expensive than Arbitrum?
The argument is about gas and execution costs rather than the token itself. Arbitrum settles transactions cheaply across a broad DeFi ecosystem, while Hyperliquid concentrates activity on a single perpetuals venue. If you trade small size frequently, gas differences matter more than order book depth.
Is Near Protocol really an AI coin?
Near has spent years building developer tooling and has positioned itself around AI-adjacent infrastructure, which is why it gets grouped with that narrative. The $15 target mentioned by viewers depends on capital continuing to rotate into AI-themed crypto and on the chain converting development activity into real usage.
What alternatives do viewers suggest instead of these three?
The most frequently named alternative is Bittensor (TAO), followed by Midnight, Zcash, Plume, Grass, Ondo, Aerodrome and Sonic. Some traders also argue Zcash is a better bet than Near. These are community suggestions rather than part of the original breakdown.